Dilatory Poetry Rambles
"What if a much of a which of a windgives the truth to summer's lie;
bloodies with dizzying leaves the sun
and yanks immortal stars awry?"
E.E. Cummings
I've always had a soft spot in my heart for E.E. Cummings. I know a lot of people don't like his kind of modern poetry, especially his poetry for the eye, but its something that just appeals to me. I've never quite understood why people try to fit their art into little boxes, and make what use of the boxes they can. On the other hand, there are people like Wordsworth or (of course) Shakespeare who just take their idiom and take it beyond the realm of human scope. All of us, no matter how much we practice, no matter how beautiful our verse, we will never write sonnets like Shakespeare, any more than we could compose fugues like J.S. Bach or paint landscapes like Monet. I listened to a lecture on the originality of Beethoven yesterday, and how people have spent centuries trying to understand his music, to fit words around it like other, lesser composers. But you can't. There are things in art that transcend our words and probably even our experience. And the fact is, that only Beethoven could compose the Eroica symphony. Only Picasso could paint Le Troix Mademoiselles. Only Shakespeare could write The Tempest. These men (and women, too, though I haven't mentioned any.) sometimes seem out of our reach, out of our range of possible contributions to what humans consider beautiful. But it is at times like that that our minds are too full of themselves. We are not meant to be another Beethoven or Shakespeare. There is no need for them. They have already poured out their souls on the human stage. The thing is, we don't need to write or compose or paint to add to the human play. If we find something, within ourselves or with direction, that we find we can pour out what we are, what we have to offer, then mankind is better off for it. It's what we are meant to do.
Another E.E. Cummings:
maggie and millie and molly and may
went down to the beach (to play one day)
and maggie discovered a shell that sang
so sweetly she couldn't remember her troubles, and
millie befriended a stranded star
whose rays five languid fingers were;
and molly was chased by a horrible thing
which raced sideways while blowing bubbles:and
may came home with a smooth round stone
as small as a world and as large as alone
For whatever we lose(like a you or a me)
It's always ourselves we find in the sea
7 Comments:
If you're confused by this post, just check what time I wrote it.
Only 1:37 AM, Emmett? Come on, you can do better than that.
And I would hate to think that those sorts of geniuses defined some sort of "upper limit" for human achievement. It's certain that I'll never pull off anything like what they did, but there will be a few geniuses throughout our civilization who can rise to the standards set by Shakespeare and Beethoven. They won't be doing qutie the same thing, of course, as true imitation is fairly impossible, but they may be doing something extremely similar, and they may even be better than the old guys.
I mean, where would our understanding of physics be if no one else was allowed to be as genius as Sir Isaac Newton was?
I never said that they were an upper limit. I merely said that we could never match what they've done in their own idiom. If someone came along and wrote better sonnets than Shakespeare, we would still honor Shakespeare because of his wonderful sonnets. Anyone coming after Shakespeare finds his work contained in what Shakespeare did. The same is true for Isaac Newton. In fact, I think he said it best: If I know anything it's only because I stood on the shoulders of giants.
Oh, and the time is misleading. 1:37 is when I began it. I left halfway through, watched a movie and then came back, finishing it around gozen go-ji han desu.
Meaning 5:00 A.M.
Ah. That's better. Good job, Emmett.
*stands up and cheers in agreement*
Yes!
(no e.e. cummings)
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home